...use StayHub, and alleges no tax injury, sued because he believes City officials are violating the Constitution and wasting public resources. StayHub, Host, and Citizen file a federal action against City seeking declarato...
Citations: Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, Federal Election Commission v. Akins, FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
...in legally removable but generally should not be pursued unless local officials identify a serious public-safety reason. Several states sue, asking a federal court to order the Department to remove every person covered b...
Citations: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/470/821/, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-58_i425.pdf, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/343/579/
A federal statute directs state election officials to enforce a federal online-registration rule, authorizes a federal agency to restructure major social-media platforms using broad language, gives a private industry boa...
Citations: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/584/16-476/, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/462/919/, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/697/, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/606/24-354/
...nt is sued for damages based on two sets of conduct: firing a federal official after a policy dispute and, years before taking office, breaching a private real-estate contract. The President asserts absolute civil immuni...
Citations: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/
Congress creates a federal enforcement official with authority to investigate and fine private companies. The statute provides that the official is appointed by the Speaker of the House. Which statement is most accurate?...
Citations: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-3-1/ALDE_00013092/
...any documentary film may be shown in a public auditorium. The permit official may deny a permit if the film is "unsuitable for the community" and the ordinance contains no deadline for decision or prompt judicial review...
Citations: U.S. Const. amend. I, Freedman v. Maryland, City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.
Defendant sent repeated messages to a city official saying, "You will not survive what is coming" and "I know where you park." The official reasonably felt threatened. Defendant argues that the First Amendment requires m...
Citations: U.S. Const. amend. I, Counterman v. Colorado
Health officials seize a restaurant's refrigerated food without a prior hearing after inspectors find evidence that the food is causing an active outbreak. The owner receives no opportunity to contest the seizure for six...
Citations: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/424/319/, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-585_k5fm.pdf
State creates official specialty license plates that it designs, owns, and approves as part of a state program. A private group asks State to issue a plate with the group's preferred message. State refuses because it doe...
Citations: U.S. Const. amend. I, Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Shurtleff v. City of Boston
Sara is tried in Delaware Superior Court for felony assault. On the first day of trial, only 10 qualified jurors remain available. The judge says the court has no courtroom space for a restart and orders trial to proceed...
Citations: Delaware Constitution article I, Section 7, Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 23, Ramos v. Louisiana, Sullivan v. Louisiana
...office conduct. The former President argues that executive privilege, official-act immunity, and his former office bar the criminal and civil proceedings. Before leaving office, the President pardoned a former aide for a...
Citations: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/683/, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
...ust comply with extensive state health regulations, but no government official participated in the refusal. What is the best Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection analysis? This question tests the state-action threshold...
Citations: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/419/345/
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Torts, Restatement (Third) of Torts
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Torts, Restatement (Third) of Torts
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Torts, Restatement (Third) of Torts
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Torts, Restatement (Third) of Torts
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Torts, Restatement (Third) of Torts
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
...hanged position after relying on the relevant statement, document, or official action. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. Which analysis is most consistent with these facts? Correct. The answer s...
USABarPrep Coach