.... Delaware Constitution article I, Section 7, Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 23, Ramos v. Louisiana, Sullivan v. Louisiana
Citations: Delaware Constitution article I, Section 7, Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 23, Ramos v. Louisiana, Sullivan v. Louisiana
...utive privilege, official-act immunity, and his former office bar the criminal and civil proceedings. Before leaving office, the President pardoned a former aide for all federal crimes related to the scheme. State prosec...
Citations: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/683/, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
Congress enacted a statute providing that the Department of Homeland Security "shall remove" certain noncitizens after final removal orders. Because resources are limited, the President directs the Department to prioriti...
Citations: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/470/821/, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-58_i425.pdf, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/343/579/
...to file monthly reports identifying each host, address, rental date, and amount paid. A platform that refuses to report faces civil penalties of $5,000 per day. StayHub operates in City, has received a written enforceme...
Citations: Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, Federal Election Commission v. Akins, FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
...sts Delaware and federal speedy-trial rights. Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 48(b), Barker v. Wingo, People v. Engram
Citations: Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 48(b), Barker v. Wingo, People v. Engram
.... Delaware Constitution article I, Section 7, Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 23, Ramos v. Louisiana
Citations: Delaware Constitution article I, Section 7, Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 23, Ramos v. Louisiana
...two sets of conduct: firing a federal official after a policy dispute and, years before taking office, breaching a private real-estate contract. The President asserts absolute civil immunity from both claims. Which state...
Citations: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/
...creates a federal enforcement official with authority to investigate and fine private companies. The statute provides that the official is appointed by the Speaker of the House. Which statement is most accurate? This qu...
Citations: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-3-1/ALDE_00013092/
...ages to a city official saying, "You will not survive what is coming" and "I know where you park." The official reasonably felt threatened. Defendant argues that the First Amendment requires more than proof that the offi...
Citations: U.S. Const. amend. I, Counterman v. Colorado
During jury selection in a criminal case, the judge excludes the public because the courtroom has limited seating and the judge wants jurors to speak freely. What must the court do before closing the proceeding? This que...
Citations: Waller v. Georgia, Presley v. Georgia
...tate creates official specialty license plates that it designs, owns, and approves as part of a state program. A private group asks State to issue a plate with the group's preferred message. State refuses because it does...
Citations: U.S. Const. amend. I, Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Shurtleff v. City of Boston
...nd removal for disruption. Illinois v. Allen, Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 43
Citations: Illinois v. Allen, Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 43
...Missouri, People v. Duran, Illinois v. Allen, Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 43
Citations: Waller v. Georgia, Presley v. Georgia, Deck v. Missouri, People v. Duran, Illinois v. Allen, Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 43
...tors and dismissal authority for undue delay. Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 48(b), Barker v. Wingo, Doggett v. United States, People v. Engram
Citations: Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 48(b), Barker v. Wingo, Doggett v. United States, People v. Engram
A Pennsylvania patient sued a Delaware physician in federal court in Wilmington, invoking diversity jurisdiction and alleging Delaware medical negligence. Delaware law requires a plaintiff in a health-care negligence act...
Citations: Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, Hanna v. Plumer, Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.
...arties dispute the legal effect of a contested transaction. A federal law ordered state officials to administer a federal compliance program. One argument was preserved, while another was raised only later. The parties d...
...arties dispute the legal effect of a contested transaction. A federal law ordered state officials to administer a federal compliance program. The disputed action was partly authorized but exceeded an important limitation...
...arties dispute the legal effect of a contested transaction. A federal law ordered state officials to administer a federal compliance program. The facts are close, and both sides can cite a rule that appears favorable. Th...
...arties dispute the legal effect of a contested transaction. A federal law ordered state officials to administer a federal compliance program. One side relies on notice and practical reliance; the other side points to an...
...arties dispute the legal effect of a contested transaction. A federal law ordered state officials to administer a federal compliance program. A party relied on common practice, but the record includes facts suggesting th...
...arties dispute the legal effect of a contested transaction. A federal law ordered state officials to administer a federal compliance program. The parties disagree about the legal effect of those facts. How is the court m...
...arties dispute the legal effect of a contested transaction. A federal law ordered state officials to administer a federal compliance program. The facts support the doctrine in part, but a timing problem may limit the req...
...arties dispute the legal effect of a contested transaction. A federal law ordered state officials to administer a federal compliance program. The decision maker must choose between a categorical shortcut and a fact-sensi...
...arties dispute the legal effect of a contested transaction. A federal law ordered state officials to administer a federal compliance program. Another actor changed position after relying on the relevant statement, docume...
USABarPrep Coach